Archive for October, 2015

Happy Reformation Day! Celebrate by Reading Luther’s 95 Theses

luther
DISPUTATION OF DOCTOR MARTIN LUTHER ON THE POWER AND EFFICACY OF INDULGENCES

OCTOBER 31, 1517

Out of love for the truth and the desire to bring it to light, the following propositions will be discussed at Wittenberg, under the presidency of the Reverend Father Martin Luther, Master of Arts and of Sacred Theology, and duly appointed Lecturer on these subjects at that place. He requests that those who are unable to be present and debate orally with us, may do so by letter.

In the Name our Lord Jesus Christ. Amen.

1. Our Lord and Master Jesus Christ, when He said “Repent”, willed that the whole life of believers should be repentance.

2. This word cannot be understood to mean the sacrament of penance, that is, confession and satisfaction, which is administered by the priests.

3. Yet it does not mean inward repentance only; for there is no inward repentance that does not produce outwardly various mortifications of the flesh.

4. The penalty [of sin], therefore, continues so long as hatred of self continues; for this is the true inward repentance, and continues until our entrance into the kingdom of heaven.

5. The pope has neither the will nor the power to remit any penalties other than those which he has imposed either by his own authority or by that of canon law.

6. The pope cannot remit any guilt, except by declaring that it has been remitted by God and by assenting to God’s remission; though, to be sure, he may grant remission in cases reserved to his judgment. If his right to grant remission in such cases were despised, the guilt would remain entirely unforgiven.

7. God remits guilt to no one whom He does not, at the same time, humble in all things and bring into subjection to His representative, the priest.

8. The penitential canons apply only to the living, and, according to them, none applies to the dead.

9. Therefore the Holy Spirit acting in the person of the pope manifests grace to us, because in his [the pope’s] decrees he always excludes the dead and cases of hardship.

10. Ignorant and wicked are the actions of those priests who impose canonical penances on the dead in purgatory.

11. This changing of the canonical penalty to the penalty of purgatory is quite evidently one of the tares that were sown while the bishops slept.

12. In former times the canonical penalties were imposed not after, but before absolution, as tests of true contrition.

13. The dying are freed by death from all penalties; they are already dead to canonical rules, and have a right to be released from them.

14. The imperfect piety and love of the dying brings with it, of necessity, great fear; and the smaller the love, the greater is the fear.

15. This fear and horror is sufficient in itself alone (to say nothing of other things) to constitute the penalty of purgatory, since it is very near to the horror of despair.

16. There seems to be the same difference between hell, purgatory, and heaven as there are between despair, almost-despair, and the assurance of safety.

17. The horror of souls in purgatory should grow less and love ought to increase.

18. It seems unproven, either by reason or Scripture, that they are outside the state of merit, that is to say, of increasing love.

19. Again, it seems unproven that they, or at least that all of them, are certain or assured of their own salvation, though we may be quite certain of it.

20. Therefore by “full remission of all penalties” the pope means not actually “of all,” but only of those imposed by himself.

21. Therefore those preachers of indulgences who say that by the pope’s indulgences a man is freed from every penalty and saved are in error;

22. Indeed he cannot pass on to souls in purgatory any penalty which canon law declares should be paid in this life.

23. If it is at all possible to grant to anyone the remission of all penalties whatsoever, it is certain that this remission could be granted only to the most perfect, that is, to very few.

24. Therefore it must be the case that the greater part of the people are deceived by that indiscriminate and highsounding promise of release from penalty.

25. The power which the pope has, in general, over purgatory, is just like the power which any bishop or curate has, in particular, within his own diocese or parish.

26. The pope does well when he grants remission to souls [in purgatory], not by the power of the keys (which he does not possess), but by way of intercession.

27. There is no divine authority for preaching that so soon as the penny jingles into the money-box, the soul flies out [of purgatory].

28. It is certain that when the penny jingles into the money-box, gain and avarice can be increased, but the result of the intercession of the Church is in the power of God alone.

29. Who knows whether all the souls in purgatory wish to be bought out of it, as in the legend of Sts. Severinus and Paschal.*

[*This legend tells of two saints who were willing to remain in torment in purgatory to suffer for others.]

30. No one is sure that his own contrition is sincere; much less that he has attained full remission.

31. The man who sincerely buys indulgences is as rare as the man that is truly penitent; that is, such men are most rare.

32. They will be condemned eternally, together with their teachers, who believe themselves sure of their salvation because they have letters of pardon.

33. Men must be on their guard against those who say that the pope’s pardons are that inestimable gift of God by which man is reconciled to Him;

34. For these “graces of pardon” concern only the penalties of sacramental satisfaction, and these are appointed by man.

35. It is not according to Christian doctrine to preach and teach that contrition is not necessary for those who intend to buy souls out of purgatory or to buy confessional licenses.

36. Every truly repentant Christian has a right to full remission of penalty and guilt, even without letters of pardon.

37. Every true Christian, whether living or dead, has part in all the blessings of Christ and the Church; and this is granted him by God, even without letters of pardon.

38. Nevertheless, the remission and participation [in the blessings of the Church] which are granted by the pope are in no way to be despised, for as I have said, they are the declaration of divine remission.

39. It is most difficult, even for the very best theologians, to commend to the people the abundance of pardons while at the same time encouraging true contrition.

40. True contrition seeks and loves penalties, but generous pardons only relax penalties and cause them to be hated, or at least, furnish an occasion [for hating them].

41. Papal pardons should be preached with caution, lest people falsely think they are preferable to other good works of love.

42. Christians should be taught that the pope does not intend the purchase of pardons to be compared in any way to works of mercy.

43. Christians should be taught that he who gives to the poor or lends to the needy does a better work than buying pardons;

44. Because love grows by works of love, and a man becomes a better man; but by pardons he does not grow better, only escapes penalty.

45. Christians should be taught that he who sees a person in need, and passes him by, and then purchases pardons, purchases not the indulgences of the pope, but the indignation of God.

46. Christians should be taught that unless they have more than they need, they are bound to keep what is necessary for their own families, and should by no means squander it on pardons.

47. Christians are to be taught that the buying of pardons is a voluntary matter, and not a legal requirement.

48. Christians should be taught that in granting pardons the pope needs and desires their devout prayer for him more than the money they bring.

49. Christians are to be taught that the pope’s pardons are useful only if they do not put their trust in them; but altogether harmful, if they lose their fear of God because of them.

50. Christians should be taught that if the pope knew the exactions of the pardon-preachers, he would rather that St. Peter’s church be reduced to ashes than be built up with the skin, flesh and bones of his sheep.

51. Christians should be taught that it would be the pope’s wish, as it is his duty, to give of his own money, even though the church of St. Peter might have to be sold, to many of those from whom certain hawkers of pardons cajole money.

52. The assurance of salvation by letters of pardon is useless, even though the commissary, or indeed even though the pope himself, were to stake his soul upon it.

53. They are enemies of Christ and of the pope, who forbid the Word of God to be preached at all in some Churches, in order that pardons may be preached in others.

54. Injury is done the word of God when, in the same sermon, an equal or a longer time is spent on pardons than on this word.

55. It must be the intention of the pope that if pardons, which are a very small thing, are celebrated with one bell, with single processions and ceremonies, then the Gospel, which is the very greatest thing, should be preached with a hundred bells, a hundred processions, a hundred ceremonies.

56. The “treasures of the Church,” out of which the pope grants indulgences, are not sufficiently spoken of or known among the people of Christ.

57. That they are not temporal treasures is certainly evident, for many of the vendors do not grant such treasures freely, but only collect them.

58. Nor are they the merits of Christ and the Saints, for even without the pope, these always work grace for the inner man, and the cross, death, and hell for the outward man.

59. St. Lawrence said that the treasures of the Church were the Church’s poor, but he used the term in accordance with the custom of his own time.

60. Without rashness we say that the keys of the Church are that treasure, given by Christ’s merit;

61. For it is clear that the power of the pope is of itself sufficient for the remission of penalties and of reserved cases,

62. The true treasure of the Church is the Most Holy Gospel of the glory and the grace of God.

63. But this treasure is naturally most odious, for it makes the first to be last.

64. On the other hand, the treasure of indulgences is naturally most acceptable, for it makes the last to be first.

65. Therefore the treasures of the Gospel are nets with which they formerly desired to fish for men of wealth.

66. Now, the treasures of the indulgences are nets with which they fish for the wealth of men.

67. The indulgences which the preachers cry as the “greatest graces” are in fact truly such only when they promote financial gain.

68. Yet they are in truth the very smallest graces compared with the grace of God and the piety of the Cross.

69. Bishops and curates are bound to receive the commissaries of papal pardons, with all reverence.

70. But they are under greater obligation to watch closely and listen carefully lest these men preach their own imaginings instead of the commission of the pope.

71. He who speaks against the validity of apostolic pardons, let him be anathema and accursed!

72. But he who guards against the lust and license of the pardon-preachers, let him be blessed!

73. The pope justly thunders against those who, by any means, contrive the injury of the traffic in pardons.

74. But much more does he intend to thunder against those who use the pretext of pardons to contrive the injury of holy love and truth.

75. It is folly to think that the papal pardons are so powerful that they could absolve a man even if he had committed an impossible sin and violated the Mother of God.

76. We say, on the contrary, that the papal pardons are not able to remove the very least of venial sins, so far as its guilt is concerned.

77. It is said that even St. Peter, if he were now Pope, could not bestow greater graces; this is blasphemy against St. Peter and against the pope.

78. We say, on the contrary, that even the present pope, and any pope at all, has greater graces at his disposal; specifically, the Gospel, powers, gifts of healing, etc., as it is written in 1 Corinthians 12.

79. To say that the cross emblazoned with the papal arms, which is set up [by the preachers of indulgences], is of equal worth with the Cross of Christ, is blasphemy.

80. The bishops, curates and theologians who permit such assertions to be spread among the people will be held accountable for it.

81. This unbridled preaching of pardons makes it difficult even for learned men to defend the respect due the pope from false accusations, or even from the astute criticisms of the laity;

82. For example: — “Why does not the pope empty purgatory, for the sake of holy love and of the dire need of the souls that are there, if he can redeem an infinite number of souls for the sake of miserable money with which to build a Church? The former reasons would be most just; the latter is most trivial.”

83. Again: — “Why do funeral and anniversary masses for the dead continue to be said? Why does the pope not return or permit the repayment of the endowments founded on their behalf, since it is wrong to pray for those now redeemed?”

84. Again: — “What is this new piety of God and the pope, that for money they allow an impious man who is their enemy to buy out of purgatory the devout soul of a friend of God, when they do not allow that pious and beloved soul to be redeemed without payment for pure love’s sake or because of its need of redemption?”

85. Again: — “Why are the penitential canon laws long, which in actual fact and practice are long obsolete and dead, now satisfied by the granting of indulgences, as though they were still alive and in effect?”

86. Again: — “Why does not the pope, whose wealth is today greater than the wealthiest of the wealthy, build just this one church of St. Peter with his own money, rather than with the money of poor believers?”

87. Again: — “What is it that the pope dispenses to people, and what participation does he grant, to those who have a right to full remission and participation because of their perfect repentance?”

88. Again: — “What greater blessing could come to the Church than if the pope were to do a hundred times a day what he now does only once, and bestow on every believer these remissions and participations?”

89. “Since the pope seeks the salvation of souls rather than money by his pardons, why does he suspend the indulgences and pardons granted before now, since these have equal efficacy?”

90. To repress these arguments and scruples of the laity by force alone, and not to resolve them by giving reasons, is to expose the Church and the pope to the ridicule of their enemies, and to make Christians unhappy.

91. If, therefore, pardons were preached according to the spirit and mind of the pope, all these doubts would be readily resolved; indeed, they would cease to exist.

92. Away, then, with all those prophets who say to the people of Christ, “Peace, peace,” where there is no peace!

93. Blessed be all those prophets who say to the people of Christ, “the cross, the cross,” where there is no cross!

94. Christians are to be exhorted that they be diligent in following Christ, their Head, through penalties, deaths, and hell;

95. And thus be confident of entering into heaven rather through many tribulations, than through the assurance of peace.

| Permalink
Joel: Locusts & Spirit (part 1 – 1:1-20)

JoelThe prophetic writing of Joel is a fascinating work pointing to a series of natural disasters as a foreshadowing of the coming eschatological day of the Lord in order to call the people of God to repentance. Joel opens with the standard prophetic formula, “The word of the Lord that came to Joel,” signaling that the words of Joel are to be received as the very words of Yahweh. While we know very little about either the historic man or his father, Pethuel, our lack of definitive knowledge provides no reason to question the validity or gravity of his message as some may attempt to do. Further, we find support for accepting the message of Joel in the New Testament book of Acts which records Peter’s proclamation concerning the events taking place on the day of Pentecost, “For these people are not drunk, as you suppose, since it is only the third hour of the day. But this is what was uttered through the prophet Joel” (Acts 2:15-16, ESV). In addition to bolstering the authority of Joel, Peter’s declaration helps direct our interpretation of the prophetic work by authoritatively identifying its fulfillment with the pouring out of the Holy Spirit on the people of God.

Joel’s prophecy opens with a call to the elders and “all inhabitants of the land” to pay attention to what has happened.

Hear this, you elders;
give ear, all inhabitants of the land!
Has such a thing happened in your days,
or in the days of your fathers?
Tell your children of it,
and let your children tell their children,
and their children to another generation (Joel 1:2-3, ESV).

In Joel 1:4-20 we read of a threefold disaster: 1) a plague of locusts has destroyed the crops (1:4); 2) crops have withered due to drought (1:12, 17, 20); and 3) fields and forests have been destroyed by fires (1:19-20). It is hard to overestimate the compounding impact these locust, drought, and fire disasters would have brought on a pre-industrial, agricultural society. Social devastation came as people struggled to provide for their families or even eat (1:5, 11, 16). Spiritual devastation came as the animals, grains, and wines needed for offerings died, withered, and dried up (1:9, 13, 18). Economic devastation came as trade goods ran out (1:11-12). The devastation was near total.

As Joel recounts the devastation that has come to the people of God, he calls the people to recognize both their immediate and eschatological need for the Lord. It is perverse to ignore the brokenness that surrounds us and continue living as if all were as it should be, so Joel calls even the drunkards to wake up and weep over their lack of wine. He calls the people to weep as a widowed virgin would. He calls the priests to mourn, the workers to be ashamed, and the elders to call a fast, pointing people to God that he might help them and connecting the current situation to the coming day of the Lord in which God will judge all creation with equity and save only those who have come to him for mercy.

Interestingly, Joel does not take the natural disasters as a judgement per se; rather, Joel sees the present brokenness devastating the lives of the people of God as a sign of future judgement and a reminder of their dependence on God. Certainly, when we consider the condition of Israel reported in Joel against the backdrop of the Mosaic Law there is room to see the current situation in terms of judgement; however, Joel simply takes the current devastation as a sign of what is yet to come in order to call the people to repentance and faith. Joel’s view of brokenness in the world, including natural disasters, serves to inform how we should view brokenness in our lives. It is not the case that God does not discipline his children as any loving father does (see Hebrews 12). Nor is it the case that God does not have the prerogative to act according to his will. It is the case that we do not have perfect knowledge and therefore are limited in our ability to offer such definitive interpretation of such events. However, with Joel, we can and should acknowledge present brokenness and be reminded of both our present and eschatological need for the grace and mercy of God that comes to us through Jesus Christ.

 

| Permalink
Joel: Locusts & Spirit

Tomorrow we will begin a new series on the minor prophet, Joel. Plan to join us, and share the link with friends.

Joel

| Permalink
Ephesians 1.1-2 – Greeting the Epheisans

The sermon recording from October 25, 2015.

| Permalink
Ephesians

This Sunday we will begin working our way through Paul’s letter to the Ephesians, a letter about the finished work of Jesus Christ uniting all nations as one body and making us all partakers of the same promises through the gospel of Jesus Christ. Join us at 10:30 AM as we study gospel unity.

Ephesians

| Permalink
Matthew 7.24-29 – How to Build a House

The sermon recording from October 11,2015. The text is Matthew 7.24-29

| Permalink
Notes on 1 John – 5:18-21

We know that everyone who has been born of God does not keep on sinning,

John has made this point multiple times throughout his letter. “Everyone who has been born of God,” is a reference to Christians and to the transformative, live giving power of the gospel of Jesus Christ. Based on verses such as 1 John 2:1 we know that John is not saying Christians never ever sin again. Rather, as we have pointed out before, “keep on sinning” is pointing to ongoing, willful sin. John is making the point that the gospel is powerful to transform those who believe in Christ.

but he who was born of God protects him,

“He who was born of God” is a reference to Jesus Christ, reminding us that he is the Son of God. Jesus is the only begotten Son of God, which is also to say that Jesus is God. John is clear in his gospel that Jesus is to be understood to be the creator of all things. Here John is telling us that the One who created all things, the one who has such power also protects those who have been born of God. This is why Paul can so confidently ask in Romans 8,

What then shall we say to these things? If God is for us, who can be against us? He who did not spare his own Son but gave him up for us all, how will he not also with him graciously give us all things? Who shall bring any charge against God’s elect? It is God who justifies. Who is to condemn? Christ Jesus is the one who died—more than that, who was raised—who is at the right hand of God, who indeed is interceding for us. Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or danger, or sword? As it is written, “For your sake we are being killed all the day long; we are regarded as sheep to be slaughtered.” No, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him who loved us. For I am sure that neither death nor life, nor angels nor rulers, nor things present nor things to come, nor powers, nor height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord (Romans 8:31-39, ESV).

and the evil one does not touch him.

“Though Satan should buffet,
though trials should come,
let this blest assurance control,
that Christ has regarded my helpless estate,
and has shed his own blood for my soul” (“It Is Will with My Soul”, Horatio G. Spafford, Trinity Hymnal).

If we have been purchased by the very blood of Christ, Satan may attack and accuse, but he is threatening only as one already defeated by the very One who hold us in his hand, the One to whom the Father has given us. He accuses with vain truths, for Jesus has satisfied God’s wrath toward our sin. He threatens with empty words, for in Christ we are more than conquerors.

We know that we are from God, and the whole world lies in the power of the evil one.

John tells us in his gospel that we have been born of God. We are not born of the flesh, that is, we are not of this world. While the whole world, for the time, lies in the power of the evil one, we are not of this world, but of God. It is for this reason that the evil one cannot touch us. Satan may have all kinds of influence in the world via full frontal attacks that wreak havoc or via convincing people to call that which is a lie the truth, but the people of God will be preserved.

And we know that the Son of God has come and has given us understanding, so that we may know him who is true;

This is why Jesus has come, that we may know God. John has made this argument from the beginning of his letter. What we have lacked in know God, Jesus has given to us.

and we are in him who is true, in his Son Jesus Christ.

By faith we have been united to Christ in such an intimate way that his victory is our victory. His righteousness has been credited to our account. And, his status as son has been shared with us.

He is the true God and eternal life.

There is nothing else and no one else that we need. God himself has secured life itself for us through the work of Jesus Christ who is eternal life. John wrote the same thing in his gospel when he recorded Jesus’ words, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life” (John 14:6, ESV).

Little children, keep yourselves from idols.

To worship anyone other that the triune God (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit) is idolatry. To worship Jesus as something other than who and what he is, is idolatry. To look to anyone or anything other than Jesus for that which is freely promised in Jesus is idolatry. John closes his letter reminding his readers to keep themselves from any and all from of idolatry.

 

| Permalink
Matthew 7.21-23 – I Never Knew You

The sermon recording from October 4, 2015.

| Permalink